Why is it that a youth who kills another under 16 year old in a London park can not be named, but someone of the same age who posts on Facebook that people should riot in Bangor (possibly) is named in a Worcester court? What is going on here! The riot did not happen, but the other guy was murdered. Which one do you think should be named?
This seems wrong!
Wednesday, 24 August 2011
Legal Differences - If You Are A Youth, Should You Be Named?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
You realy want to comment? You must be mad! Go ahead, make my day!